The Art of Poetry
De Arte Poetica liber
Headnote
The Ars Poetica — the “Epistle to the Pisos,” as the ancients also knew it — is Horace’s longest single poem and the most influential work of literary criticism to come out of antiquity. It is a verse letter of some 476 hexameters, addressed to a father and his two sons of the noble Piso family, and it belongs in form and in voice to the relaxed, conversational sermo of the Satires and Epistles: practical advice on the making of poems, delivered with the ease of a man talking to friends, not the oracular pronouncement its later fame might suggest. Composed late, probably around 19–18~BC (some place it later still), it was transmitted with Book~II of the Epistles, of which it is in effect the third and largest letter, and the present edition prints it on its own.
The poem has no formal divisions, and it ambles — deliberately — by association rather than system; readers since antiquity have complained of its apparent disorder, which is itself a kind of joke, since the poem opens by demanding unity and consistency above all. Beneath the digressions a coherent program can be traced. Horace begins with the principle of organic unity (the painter’s monster; the irrelevant “purple patch”; simplex dumtaxat et unum, “simple, and one”), passes to the choice of subject within one’s powers, to diction and the right to coin new words (the famous callida iunctura, the cunning placing of a familiar word, and the simile of words that fall and revive like the leaves of a wood), and then to the meters and matter proper to each genre. A long central stretch concerns the drama — decorum of character and emotion (si vis me flere, dolendum est primum ipsi tibi, “if you would have me weep, you must first grieve yourself”), the handling of traditional and invented material, the economy of Homer who plunges in medias res, the four ages of man, the conventions of the stage (what to show and what to narrate, the five acts, the chorus, the satyr play), and a miniature history of Greek and Roman dramatic poetry. The closing third turns to the poet himself: against the cult of inspired madness Horace sets the labor of the file (limae labor), the demand that wisdom and knowledge of life be the source of writing well, the union of nature and art, the famous formula that the poet should aut prodesse aut delectare — profit or please, and best of all do both (omne tulit punctum qui miscuit utile dulci) — the toleration of small faults (even good Homer nods), the refusal of any mediocrity in poets, the value of an honest critic like the dead Quintilius, and, in a famous comic finale, the portrait of the deranged poet who seizes his victim and reads him to death, a leech that will not let go.
The work is dense with Greek and Roman literary reference worn lightly — Homer and Archilochus, Thespis and Aeschylus and Old Comedy, the legendary civilizing bards Orpheus and Amphion, the Roman dramatists Plautus, Accius, and Ennius, the critic Aristarchus, the philosopher-poet Empedocles — and it crystallizes, in phrase after quotable phrase, the doctrines of decorum, unity, labor, and the double end of poetry that would govern European criticism through the Renaissance and the neoclassical age. The voice is the mature Horace: urbane, ironic, self-deprecating (he casts himself as the whetstone that sharpens the blade though it cuts nothing), and serious about craft precisely because he refuses to be solemn about it.